Throughout the first paragraph of Kings speech, he used emotional diction with words such as struggle, poverty, and poor to prove that the war in Vietnam was bringing down the Americans and their families fighting overseas. Acting almost as a climax, King lyrically urges his audience to voice their opinions and wage a war against this unjustified war in Vietnam. Martin Luther King (MLK) was an activist and a minister who claimed that the war on Vietnam was wrong. His use of imagery and diction is aimed at making people break their silence and express their anger clearly. On April 4, 1967, King addressed a crowd of 3,000 in Riverside Church by delivering a speech titled, "Beyond Vietnam," in the midst of the cruelty of the Vietnam War. Ethos, the appeal to the legitimacy and authority of the speaker, is used throughout the speech. Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King's "Beyond Vietnam: a Time to No one should be restricted from rights and opportunities that others are given for that long. Copyright 2023 IPL.org All rights reserved. This quote is referencing how poor and rich people were drafted to war but the poor people had no one left to support the family. An Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam Dr. King plainly states his purpose near the beginning of his speech. Furthermore, such a vivid picture will linger permanently in the audiences mind, which will make them think about the terrible outcome in the future. Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King's "Beyond Vietnam - StudyMode Rhetorical Analysis, Martin Luther King Rhetorical Devices Analysis, Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr.S Speech, A Rhetorical Analysis Journey Through Martin Luther King Jr.s SpeechI Have a Dream. These statements serve to communicate to the audience that the speaker is someone of authority and should be listened to. His audience at Riverside Church, likely familiar with his Civil Rights work, would most likely than view him with more credibility because they too could sympathize to an injustice done by the American government. Though disappointed, King still loves the church. Later, he mentions, I am a preacher by calling, I suppose it is not surprising that I have seven major reasons for bringing Vietnam into the field of my moral vision. (King). King spoke for the weak that did not have the voices to speak for themselves; for example, he represented the poor. King spoke for the weak that did not have the voices to speak for themselves; for example, he represented the poor. It allows them to imagine what might happen if America were to keep fighting in the war. If you have a suggestion about this website or are experiencing a problem with it, or if you need to report abuse on the site, please let us know. "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." Dont Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audience's anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. On April 4, 1967 Martin Luther King Jr. wrote a speech named, Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence addressing the Vietnam War. Apart from drawing a parallel between the situation in Vietnam and America, he shows neither stood to gain from it. In the article "Beyond Vietnam", Martin Luther argues that war in Vietnam has far reaching affects that not only rapaciously take away America's resources, but make an immediate impact on African Americans perspective on the civil rights movement. In other words, the resources were used for the soldiers, yet the poor still needed them just as so. It also describes the Jim Crow laws and the busboy cot from 1955. Correct writing styles (it is advised to use correct citations) This special lyrical and parallel structure helped get his main points across and allows a large audience to understand simple but powerful words (Layfield) . His choice of words in the speech is meant to have a direct effect on the audience's psychology. Apart from the use of ethos, pathos and logos in his speech, he builds a rock solid argument by involving religious figures and facts from history and philosophy. In his second paragraph, he connects with his audience by saying we have been repeatedly faced, For instance, in the second paragraph of his speech, he says, I could not be silent in the face of such cruel manipulation of the poor. The words silent, cruel, and manipulation speak out to an audience, especially for one that has faced hardship themselves in times of need. The fact that young black men are being sent [across the world] to fight for the liberties in Southeast Asia, which they [have] not found in Georgia and East Harlem questions the validity of Americas founding principles of the unalienable rights of every individual; life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam A Time To Break Silence In the speech "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence," by Martin Luther King Jr. he expresses his opinion on how the Vietnam war is unjust. Martin Luther King, Jr indicates that he is seen as a figure of authority by the civil rights movement. Comparing the Justice System during the 1960s to a corrupt bank allows the audience to connect to what Dr. King is saying. Acting almost as a climax, King lyrically urges his audience to voice their opinions and wage a war against this unjustified war in Vietnam. How Does Martin Luther King Use Rhetorical Devices It also uses a bit of strong imagery. Apart from being an advocate of Mahatma Gandhi's idea of nonviolence, Martin Luther King Jr was a great leader and rhetor of all times. Copyright 2023 IPL.org All rights reserved. The Speech "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence" by Martin Luther PDF Beyond Vietnam, speech by Dr. Martin Luther King, NYC, 4/4/67 match. Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, Beyond Vietnam A Time to Break Silence. Martin Luther King Jr. applies imagery throughout his speech in order to illustrate the horrors of the war to arouse anger at its atrocities and injustice. Thank you! Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence speech delivered on April 4, 1967, revolved around the growing concern with America's involvement in the Vietnam war. Kings main motive was to persuade people to see how war was destroying lives, society and economy and being silent meant being in approval of the war. Martin luther king jr beyond vietnam speech analysis sat. Rhetorical - M.J. By continuing well At last the paper discusses and assesses how to what an extent Kings dream came true with self-elected sources as backrest for the asses. Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence By Martin Luther King "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" is an article written by Martin Luther King Jr himself. For instance, he starts by stating the effects of the Vietnam War forced the American poverty program: "experiments, hopes, new beginnings." He does this by appealing to certain issues the public see as important, using irony, and using diction and tone in persuasive ways. Thank you for sharing this page with a friend! Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. (2022) 'The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis'. Likewise, the image of men, both black and while, in brutal solidarity burning the huts of a poor village, helps establish the war in Vietnam as a complete disaster and atrocity. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam" Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. The war lasted from 1955 to 1975.The nation as a whole began to uproar over the war and the major consequences of the war. The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis. In his speech, Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence Martin Luther King Jr., uses appeals to emotion, appeals to credibility, and powerful diction to strengthen his argument and persuade his audience that the Vietnam War is unjust. He offers many practical reasons for the opposition, as well as spiritual and moral reasons. Likewise, during this time period, America [put little effort into] rehabilitation of its poor creating an even harder life for them (Source A). report, Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther Kings Beyond Vietnam: a Time to Break Silence. King is effectively able to convey his point about his topic by using rhetorical devices such as logos, ethos, pathos. Please enter the email address that you use to login to TeenInk.com, and we'll email you instructions to reset your password. Showing his knowledge of the history of the war and using it to discredit the United States reason for being there is crucial to Dr. King in developing his position. As a leader of his people, King took the stand to take radical measures to overcome the false promises of the sovereign government that had been addressing the issues of racial segregation through unimplemented transparent laws that did nothing to change the grim realities of the society. Through this speech, and his ideals of determination, many rhetorical devices are put to use to drive forth these points. His speech emphasizes at transitioning from war to peace and from violence to a nonviolent and peaceful society. The rhetoric helps prove how the poor lived worse in the, King, a supporter of President Lyndon B. Johnson and his Great Society, became concerned about U.S. involvement in Vietnam. Disclaimer: Services provided by StudyCorgi are to be used for research purposes only. Graduateway.com is owned and operated by Radioplus Experts Ltd He believed that the Vietnam War diverted money and attention from domestic programs created to aid the black poor and would benefit only the banks who fund wars and the industries that supply the war. Beyond_Vietnam_Rhetorical_Analysis_Essay.docx.docx - Thomas Moreover, this set of diction allows King to logically state that he can not continue to fight on behalf of the oppressed if he himself doesnt address their oppressor, the U.S. government. Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King's Beyond Vietnam We Will Write a Custom Case Study SpecificallyFor You For Only $13.90/page! May 4, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. King supports his discussion by establishing authority and appealing to his listeners emotions. King Jr delivered his "Beyond Vietnam -- A Time to Break Silence" in 1967 in NewYork City. He states, Many people have questioned me about the wisdom of my path. (2022, May 4). His main purpose was to try to persuade the audience to . Martin Luther King Jr says in his first paragraph that,"It seemed as if there was a real promise fr hope to draw men and skills and money like some demonic destruction suction tube." Beyond Vietnam A Time To Break Silence Analysis - Bartleby To start, Dr. Kings use of metaphors allows his audience to understand his viewpoint better. This makes the irony explicit and that Vietnam being a smaller and weaker nation was being made to face injustice which it never deserved or desired. While his words clearly deliver his disappointment over the path American government had chosen, it also expresses a clear intention to not be with the wrong and instead listen to ones inner voice. writing your own paper, but remember to King is well aware that an audience that experiences strong emotional response to this speech is more likely to be convinced of his. Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam" King also links the issue to the question of Americas integrity. If you are the original creator of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Encompassed within this quote is pathos because the harsh accusation leads the reader to think poorly of the government while pitying the poor. He applies ethos to establish credibility, pathos to appeal to emotions, and logos to support his claims with hard evidence. Many people believed that America had no reason to interfere, Dr. King being one of those people. He notes, as if it were some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war, and I knew that America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued to draw men and skills and money like some demonic destructive suction tube. Some would be uninterested and some not knowing what to do. We try to make TeenInk.com the best site it can be, and we take your feedback very seriously. Martin Luther King, Jr in his speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence argued that US foreign policy was hypocritical when compared to the inequality present in the United States. In Martin Luther King Jr's passionate speech about America's involvement in Vietnam, he manages to create a strong and compelling argument that America's involvement in unjust . This lecture became an explosive example of colorful language and visual examples that expanded the idea of rhetoric. King's criticism of the war as "broken and eviscerated," allows him to establish a disappointed tone that conveys the idea that the war is immoral and by doing so his precise word choice lets him to attack it as such. King Jr makes a strong statement against war and his speech successfully evokes compassion and sympathy for the poor and the weak in both Vietnam and America. He then goes on to reveal some of his more personal feelings. In his argument, King mounts a multi-pronged attack on America's participation in the Vietnam war and also gains people's sympathy for the Vietnamese. requirements? How about receiving a customized one? 2 February 2013. One of Kings main techniques he uses to persuade the audience of his point is imagery. By repeating the phrase, "for the sake," he creates a rhythmic flow that causes his audience to be more receptive to his idea. The line, "For the sake of those boys, for the sake of this government, for the sake of the hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent," demonstrates how King uses parallelism. Nothing could be lower than being placed parallel to the senseless violence of Nazi Germany. The problems being faced by either America or Vietnam were never going to be solved through rifles but through peaceful and nonviolent action. His use of diction and imagery arouses anger while increasing his credibility since he criticizes the unjust war he describes. Rhetorical Analysis Of Mlk's Beyond Vietnam. Beyond Vietnam Rhetorical Analysis Essay.docx - Course Hero There is at the outset a very obvious and almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam and the struggle I, and others, have been waging in America. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam", Key Ingredients to Being a Successful Student. Registered address: Louki Akrita, 23 Bellapais Court, Flat/Office 46 1100, Nicosia, Cyprus In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence. In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. And, to argue that King 's most radical days were never fulfilled; that his next campaign was to confront the president over the Vietnam War and economic disparity, a direct confrontation with a president over an immoral war state Hill and Wang from the book review. The image of death, as powerful as it is, becomes amplified when Martin Luther King associates the injustices of segregation with the Vietnam war. He talks about the innocent people killed in the crossfire, mostly children. On August 28th, 1963, Martin Luther King Jr gave us one of one of the most rhetorically moving speeches ever given. 350 5th Ave, New York, NY 10118, USA. The audience felt empowered by the sentence alone. He means to make people ask questions of themselves and ponder over the meaninglessness and uselessness of war and what would remain behind once the war was over. All of the valid arguments and vivid imagery Dr. King uses combine to make this a very effective, passionate and memorable speech. Analyzes the literary device martin luther king jr. uses in his speech is allusions, adding to the importance on how awful the vietnam war was corrupting the united states. He says, And we must rejoice as well, for surely this is the first time in our nation's history that a significant number of its religious leaders have chosen to move beyond the prophesying of smooth patriotism to the high grounds of a firm dissent based upon the mandates of conscience and the reading of history. He includes various perspectives and addresses several counterarguments with the intention to prove the futility of war as a tool to address social, economic and political problems. His passionate tone flowed through these strategies, increasing their persuasive power on the people and encouraging them to follow/listen to his message on racial injustice. Since the founding of the Americas in the late 1400s, slavery was a problem; until the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation in 1862. Using the approach, the context of the speech will be analyzed according to the classical cannon of rhetorical. However, a very powerful speech, in manys opinion, is the Ive Been to the Mountaintop speech, given shortly before Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated. He is using historical facts to create a parallel between the current situation and the past. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly. You may use it as a guide or sample for However, his words while they aim to bring the pain of the Vietnamese alive before the audience also include a request that a progressive nation should stand with humanity and not lose control of its feelings. Moreover, this set of diction allows King to logically state that he can not continue to fight on behalf of the oppressed if he himself doesn't address their oppressor, the U.S. government. Which of your works would you like to tell your friends about? King uses personal anecdotes, elaborate word choice, and reliable facts to persuade his audience of the injustice of the war. 663 Words; He mentions that the war has led to the increase of violence in . Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audience's anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. He was in the process of proving that it wasn 't a money issue in America, but an equality issue. Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam 534 Words | 3 Pages In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence." In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. Martin Luther King Jr. Src: Pixabay Read a rhetorical analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam: Time to break silence. Please enter the email address that you use to login to TeenInk.com, and we'll email you instructions to reset your password. He spoke at Riverside Church in New York City, a venue that had a history of hosting progressive speakers and thinkers. Another rhetorical device is the common ground he establishes in his last sentence where he writes, "This is the story of Why We Can't Wait" (King 98-99). us: [emailprotected]. StudyCorgi, 4 May 2022, studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. The rhythm and frequent repetition are used to drive home his key points, stressing the importances of his goal. Both religion and society condemn war and even popular religious figures have stood up to speak against it for the toll it takes upon human lives and for it is against the spirit of humanity and brotherhood. (These links will automatically appear in your email.). Favorite Quote:Failures help one grow as a person. He then paints a picture of the suffering endured by Vietnam and tells how the United States has a long history of doing the wrong thing to this tiny country. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream. (King). Here, at ACaseStudy.com, we deliver professionally written papers, and the best grades for you from your professors are guaranteed! Martin Luther King Jr. was a social activist that led the Civil Rights Movement, and other movements until his assassination in 1968. In conclusion, Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Beyond Vietnam" speech was a powerful and eloquent call for peace and justice. Encompassed within this quote is pathos because the harsh accusation leads the reader to think poorly of the government while pitying the poor. He specifically mentions a poverty program that was looking promising before the United States became involved in Vietnam. King is effectively able to convey his point about his topic by using rhetorical devices such as logos, ethos, pathos. By claiming that the United States, "the greatest purveyor of violence," prefers, "massive doses of violence to solve its problems," King effectively establishes the U.S. government as the pervasive wrongdoer. Nothing evokes a more emotional response than the image of children suffering or being killed. Recognizing that citizens in poverty were not able to support their families while away from home at war, Martin Luther King included that war [and being enlisted in battle was] an enemy of poor to demonstrate how even though any man could be drafted, the economically stable left behind support for their family while the impoverished were ineligible of doing so (Source A). In his speech on the meaninglessness of the Vietnam war and to persuade the audience to listen to its own conscience rather than to conform to the idea of war in the name of patriotism, King Jr draws from the realms of economy, society, polity as well as religion and philosophy. He attempts to call upon sympathy within the audience by using highly expressive language. Rhetorical Analysis Pearl Harbor Speech - 519 Words | Cram By repeating the phrase, for the sake, he creates a rhythmic flow that causes his audience to be more receptive to his idea. An Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam Martin Luther King Jr. builds an argument to persuade his audience that American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. King makes the nation appears as hypocrites because Americans pretend to fight as a united nation whereas segregation is among the same schools, the same neighborhood, the same country. The idea of nonviolence is much larger than ordinary people see. He proves that the government has been manipulating the poor when he writes, It was sending. It permits Dr. King to enlighten people of what was going in that time period. In the 1967 speech, Beyond Vietnam, the author, activist Martin Luther King jr, states reasons why America needs to end their involvement in the Vietnam War. In short, this makes the audience more inclined to listen to the rest of Martin Luther king Jr's speech, as well as setting the bottom line that the Vietnam War creates devastating problems for everyone. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. His pleas are first to the audiences sense of logic and their immediate concerns for their own country. Just like the people of America, the Vietnamese also have a right to live free on the lands of their fathers. Finally, Martin Luther King Jr. uses parallelism within his own reflection to evoke emotions in his audience to show that . Additionally, Kings statement that Southeast Asia is eight thousand miles away strengthens the irony by making Southeast Asia seem like a place which is completely disconnected from America. "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." Which of your works would you like to tell your friends about? To construct a clear and strong picture and show how condemnable the war exercises in Vietnam were, King compared it with an arena of gladiators which even if it amuses and engages, is something absolutely animal and barbaric. In this way, he tries to stress that even if we have progressed, we have grown nowhere better than the ancient barbarians that killed for fun. Martin Luther King Jr., Malcom X, and Stokely Carmichael all had quite famous speeches that took a stance on racial inequality. He also affirms that people have better options and that the idea of war, despite that it sounds patriotic is basically inhuman. For instance, he does when he depicts the, "Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools."