[60] Expressions of doubt also appeared in the edition of Stephen Courcelles (tienne de Courcelles), in 1658, and from Johann Jakob Griesbach's edition of 1775. If there have been only 421 changes from 1611 until today, how can Wallace et al say that there have been 100,000 changes? why does the kjv have extra verses. (Some say "it stood" the he or it being the Dragon mentioned in the preceding verses) Among pre-KJV versions, the Great Bible and the Rheims version also have "he stood". (There are 155,683 words in the Apocrypha, the group of books that was almost always . I am not, of course, arguing that this is the case; I am arguing that there is a great deal of selective evidence used by KJV-only advocates used to support their position. [78], There are two passages (both 12 verses long) that continue to appear in the main text of most of the modern versions, but distinguished in some way from the rest of the text, such as being enclosed in brackets or printed in different typeface or relegated to a footnote. Archibald T. Robertson, Apparently the first English version that set forth this shorter ending is. So for some reason, Bomberg (who funnily enough was a Christian publisher, but one interested in printing the hebrew bible, the first printed mikraot gedolot, and the first printing of all tractates of the talmud bavli. What books are missing in the King James Bible compared to the - Quora A belief apparently not shared by anyone else: "No one maintains that this rather florid passage belongs to the original Mark not ever to the original form of the long ending of the Textus Receptus." you will not . Entirely omitted words: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. In fact, the words in italics in the King James Bible are words that were added by the translators to help the reader. [3] And they laid hands on them, and put them in hold unto the next day: for it was now eventide. The voice which speaks in Acts 8:37 is from a later age, with an interest in the detailed justification of the [Ethiopian] treasurerer's desire for baptism. head (the weight stones)head, the weightstones:. 50 chapters in Genesis.. Shmot-Exodus, then the letter Mem, which has the hebrew value of 40. In the case of the papyri, these are so very fragmentary that they show only that the pericope was not in its familiar place at the beginning of chapter 8. ", Matthew 18:11: "For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost. [89] So it would appear, initially, that the evidence was nearly in equipoise. in and B (both 4th century) and some much later Greek mss, a few mss of the ancient versions (Syriac, Coptic, Armenian), and is specifically mentioned in the writings of such Church Fathers as Eusebius and Jerome explicitly doubted the authenticity of the verses after verse 8 ("Almost all the Greek copies do not contain this concluding portion. Second, the problem is that the Bible that people have in their hands always have a small percentage of printing errors. Meditate on it day and night so you will be sure to obey everything written in it. I have found the relationship to be the following https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leningrad_Codex "The Westminster Leningrad Codex is an online digital version of the Leningrad Codex.transcribed from BHS". ", Luke 17:36: "Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left. The King James Bible Removed Verses October 21, . Matthew 17:21: "Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting. [duplicate], from your pastor, priest, or other trustworthy counselor, We've added a "Necessary cookies only" option to the cookie consent popup, Acceptable comments policy for Christianity Stack Exchange. (There are 155,683 words in the Apocrypha, the group of books that was almost always printed as part of the KJV Bible until late last century.) Yet this error is defended by KJV-only advocates as though it came from the pen of the apostle John himself. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. NIV VS KJV Bible Translation: (11 Epic Differences To Know) [113] Verse 9 in Greek does not mention Jesus by name or title, but only says "Having arisen he appeared " (the KJV's inclusion of the name Jesus was an editorial emendation as indicated by the use of italic typeface) and, in fact, Jesus is not expressly named until verses 19 and 20 ("the Lord" in both verses); a lengthy use of a pronoun without identification. I understand the BHS has chapter divisions. BURNT has been changed to BURNED 31 times. The last words of verse 8 are, in Greek, , usually translated "for they were afraid". This verse here is lacking in ,B,L, (original handwriting), some Coptic mss. But this argument wont fly when we consider the last six verses of Revelation: since the Greek manuscript he was using lacked the last leaf, Erasmus had to back-translate from Latin into Greek, thereby creating seventeen textual variants in Rev 22:16-21that have no Greek support!5 That these variants were carried over in the KJV translation is problematic for KJV-only folks if they wish to deny that Erasmus was inspired. Why do many companies reject expired SSL certificates as bugs in bug bounties? This verse was omitted from the Revised Version and most modern versions, but many versions include it in a footnote. You can easily view multiple chapters of the Bible at the same time. King James Bible - Verse+Audio - Apps on Google Play The word is a sort of conjunction and rarely occurs at the end of a sentence. and a number of later mss. There you have it, friends. KJV - This translation is known as the Authorized Version or the King James Bible. When I look in bibleworks, I see that the KJV has 3 chapters in Joel and 4 in Malachi. For example, Benjamin G. Wilkinson, in his 1930 book, Our Authorized Bible Vindicated, says "The Authorized Version pictures to us the congregation, composed of Jews and Gentiles. This abrupt ending may have been a deliberate choice of St. Mark or because the last part of his writing (after verse 8) was somehow separated from the rest of his manuscript and was lost (an alternative theory is that St. Mark died before finishing his Gospel). Reason: It is considered unlikely that these words were in the original text of the Gospel. The verse as it appears in the KJV is found in less ancient Greek mss (cursives, after the 9th century) and some other Italic, Syriac, Coptic, Armenian, Ethiopic, and other versions. Note- Title was "Why do different Bible versions, KJV and WLC(Westminster Leningrad Codex), have a different number of chapters in Joel and Malachi?" Thanks for contributing an answer to Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange! If Scotts statistics are correct, to find more than one or two would be disturbing, and to find even a dozen or more would show that his data are fundamentally incorrect. Greek Orthodox Churches. [140] For example, nowhere else does the Fourth Gospel mention by name the Mount of Olives, and where a new place is mentioned in the Fourth Gospel some explanatory remarks are attached, nor does the Fourth Gospel mention 'the Scribes' elsewhere. "[147], B = bracketed in the main text The translation team and most biblical scholars today believe were not part of the original text. KJV: 5 And he said, Who art thou, Lord? [45] While verse 7 is omitted in its entirety, parts of verse 6 and verse 8 are also omitted. This is based on the level of certainty the translators have about whether the verse in question comes from the original text or not. Lets face it, who would think that there was anything spurious about a few missing verses or words. Luther was concerned that the Catholic Church's emphasis on rituals, pageantry, and extra-Biblical traditions were obscuring the truth of God's word, and that studying the Bible . "), most other Church Fathers don't quote from this ending. [24], The italicized words do not appear at all in p66, 75, , A(original hand), B, C(original hand), L, and some Italic, Syriac, Coptic, and Latin Vulgate manuscripts, and in quotations of the story by several early Greek Fathers. Talk about what services you provide. Scholars have generally regarded these verses as later additions to the original text. Errors in the King James Version (Boy, are there a lot of them) Do new devs get fired if they can't solve a certain bug? "11 She said, "No man, Lord." About an argument in Famine, Affluence and Morality. "for thine is the kingdom" in the KJV but not the NIV. After all, if inspiration implies preservation, and preservation implies accessibility, accessibility of meaning is just as important as accessibility of words. Browse other questions tagged, Like any library, Christianity Stack Exchange offers great information, but, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. To clarify, only verse 7 is omitted entirely, and leaving out the beginning of verse 6 and most of verse 8. So the phrase is absent from the text of most modern translations (though it might be noted in a footnote). Study this Book of Instruction continually. [105] Even into the 17th century, some Armenian copyists were omitting the Longer Ending or including it with a note doubting its genuineness.[106]. Unlike the Dan Browns theories the Rose Line or Sangreal, the Bible is the most powerful book in human existence and therefore, only those who are intent on diminishing its powers would ever want to change it. Verse 4 ("For an angel ") appears but without the concluding words of verse 3 ('waiting for the stirring of the water ") in A (where it says the angel "bathed in the water" rather than "descended into the water"), L, 18 (fourteenth century), and an Egyptian manuscript. The NKJV includes Alexandrian texts. The spurious nature of this verse is so notorious[64] that even the Revised Version of 1881 did not bother to include nor provide a footnote for this verse, and many other modern versions do likewise. It may not be an instant, miraculous change, but when you receive God's forgiveness, He will give you strength to change your life. Newer Protestant translations make use of a scholarly critical text of the New Testament. This book of the law shall not depart out of thy mouth; but thou shalt meditate therein day and night, that thou mayest observe to do according to all that is written therein: for then thou shalt make thy way prosperous, and then thou shalt have good success. Hebraisms. If the Bible has been changed over the years, can we still trust it? This is based on the level of certainty the translators have about whether the verse in question comes from the original text or not. Currently many Christians use the New International Version (NIV), New living Translation (NLT) and many more. why does the kjv have extra versesnevada board of pharmacy regulations. Compare this to other ancient documents. Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. He had details and, though I would say that the tone of his letter was certainly less than charitable, I thought that the content needed some investigation. Recently a reader of the BSF web site sent this letter to me (and presumably to several of his friends as well): Daniel Wallace is a noted Greek scholar and professor of New Testament at Dallas Theological Seminary. Caspar Ren Gregory, who compiled a catalog of New Testament manuscripts, summarizes the situation: "Now I have no doubt that the story [of the adulteress] itself is as old as the Gospel of John or even older, and that it is a true story. Reasons why the Apocrypha does NOT belong in the Bible! This pericope was framed with marks of doubt in Johann Jakob Wettstein's 1751 Greek New Testament and some earlier Greek editions contained notes doubting its authenticity. Arias Montanus, in his Antwerp Bible of 1571, broke up the Hebrew text itself into chapters and introduced the Hebrew numerals into the body of the text itself (Ginsburg)..". Go, and sin no more. Whilst the modern day Bibles are easier to read, you should also have a King James Version to cross reference as a word here or a word there (especially thousands of them) can make a whole difference to how you interpret a scripture and listen out for God. How do I align things in the following tabular environment? Then a space of two lines is left, after which, in the same uncial hand, only in red, is written "Ariston Eritzou." To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. How Many Books Are In The Catholic Bible Vs. King James Version - YourTango [9] Some Greek editions published well before the 1881 Revised Version made similar omissions. Later Councils at Hippo (393 AD) and Carthage (397 AD) ratified this list of 73 books. But none of them affects any major doctrine and most of them arelike the internal changes within the KJV traditionspelling changes. These apocryphal books were positioned between the Old and New Testament (it also contained maps and geneologies). They believe this because the earlier Greek manuscripts don't have the phrase, and neither do early translations of the text, while there is a clear motivation for adding it in later Greek manuscripts. I will update the question again accordingly to take this into account, as we now have a source for the KJV's chapter divisions. [109] It is also reported to appear similarly (first Shorter, then Longer Ending) in some ancient versions. The addition, as translated by Moffatt: But they excused themselves saying, "This age of lawlessness and unbelief lies under the sway of Satan,who will not allow what lies under the unclean spirits to understand the truth and power of God;therefore," they said to Christ, "reveal your righteousness now. Acts 28:29. The Reasons the Protestant Church excludes them is as follows: 1. KJV: 7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the holy Ghost, and these three are one.8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, Modern versions: (omitted from main text and not in a footnote). Some other ancient sources have an entirely different ending to Mark, after verse 8, known as the "Shorter Ending". Press). [118] The Freer Logion consists of 89 words,[119] of which 8 words do not appear elsewhere in Mark. Why are some books missing from the KJV? | Bible.org It was not included in the RSV, but is set forth in a footnote to verse 14 in the NRSV with the comment that "other ancient authorities [sic plural] add, in whole or part". And in response to curiousdanni's comment regarding the relationship between the WLC,BHS,and the LC.. What am I doing wrong here in the PlotLegends specification? KJV: And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. Using indicator constraint with two variables, Identify those arcade games from a 1983 Brazilian music video. More insights from your Bible study - Get Started with Logos Bible Software for Free! This writer made a very interesting argument. But quots. "Christ answered them, "The term of years for Satan's power has now expired, but other terrors are at hand.I was delivered to death on behalf of sinners, that they might return to the truth and sin no more,that they might inherit that glory of righteousness which is spiritual and imperishable in heaven. This is a great space to write long text about your company and your services. Although many lists of missing verses specifically name the NIV as the version that had omitted them, these same verses are missing from the main text (and mostly relegated to footnotes) by the Revised Version of 1881 (RV), the American Standard Version of 1901, the Revised Standard Version of 1947 (RSV),[1] the Today's English Version (the Good News Bible) of 1966, and several others. That is perfectly sure. While Mark has no proper ending, these verses have no proper beginning. [150], List of New Testament verses not included in modern English translations. v brakes for 650b conversion; nj marching band state championship; doctor handwriting translation app; football pools draws this weekend. The Westcott & Hort Greek New Testament omitted the pericope from the main text and places it as an appendix after the end of the Fourth Gospel, with this explanation:[145] "It has no right to a place in the text of the Four Gospels; yet it is evidently from an ancient source, and it could not now without serious loss be entirely banished from the New Testament. And its not simply getting wound up about some kind of conspiracy theory. This app is the one that helps you pray and understand different words in the Bible. Among major Textus Receptus editions, this verse does not appear in the editions of Erasmus (15161535), Aldus (1518), Colinaeus (1534), Stephanus 1st 3rd eds (15461550), but it did appear in the Complutensian (1514), and in the margins of Stephanus 4th ed (1551), and all of Elzivir's and Beza's eds (15651604). Uncomfortable Facts About The Douay-Rheims - Catholic Culture [5] And a certain man was there ", and as a side-note, "Many ancient authorities insert, wholly or in part," and here present the italicized words exactly as they appeared in the KJV. despite the existence of a concluding benediction at 16:20 (whose purpose was obscured by the greetings appended at 16:2123). How many chapters did he put in Joel and how many in Malachi? Or whether it was B) 4 chapters in Joel, 3 chapters in Malachi, like the BHS. It is apologetically significant in dealing with two groups: anti-Catholics who deny the existence of vernacular translations before the King James Version (KJV) and certain Catholic Traditionalists who insist on using only the Douay. The facts condemn the critics and expose their smoke-and-mirror shell game. Hath no man condemned thee? Brooke Foss Westcott & Fenton John Anthony Hort, The New Testament in the Original Greek (1881, Cambridge & London, Macmillan & Co.) vol. It is believed probable that the clause was inserted here by assimilation because the corresponding version of this narrative, in Matthew, contains a somewhat similar rebuke to the Devil (in the KJV, "Get thee hence, Satan,"; Matthew 4:10, which is the way this rebuke reads in Luke 4:8 in the Tyndale [1534], Great Bible (also called the Cranmer Bible) [1539], and Geneva [1557] versions), whose authenticity is not disputed, and because the very same words are used in a different situation in Matthew 16:23 and Mark 8:33. See Introduction to the Holman Christian Standard Bible 2005 Removed from 2009 edition They were retained because of their 'undeniable antiquity and their value for tradition and the history of NT interpretation in the church. Top 25 Verses From The King James Bible - KJV Bibles The Use of Italics in the King James Bible Out of the 421 total changes amounting to only five one-hundredths of a percent, the following should be noted -. The Roman Catholic Church was a bit more resistant about yielding up this verse; an 1897 decision of the Holy Inquisition forbade a Catholic "to deny or even express doubt about the authenticity of" the Johannine Comma, but this was effectively reversed by a declaration of the Holy Office on June 2, 1927, which allows scholars to express doubts and even denials of the genuineness of the Comma, tempered by the fact that the Vatican would have the final authority. Answer (1 of 17): Changing the King James Version puts you on a slippery slope. "[76] However, the RV's text is that of the earliest and most esteemed mss - p74, ,A,B,C,D, and many others, including the Vulgate and other ancient versions; the appearance of the words for Jews and for Gentiles (ethna) occurs in Codices and P (both ninth cent.) (Note: not only is verse 4 omitted, but also the tail end of verse 3.). Which modern Bible translation doesn't omit verses that were - Quora I recently came across a video that highlighted the fact that new Bible versions were omitting certain verses visible in the King James Version (KJV). I see that reflected also on websites. The two 'Majority Text' Greek editions set forth the pericope in the main text (varying slightly from each other) but provide extensive notes elsewhere[146] attesting to the lack of uniformity in the text of the pericope and doubts about its origin. Did any DOS compatibility layers exist for any UNIX-like systems before DOS started to become outmoded? King James Bible - Daily Verse And Audio is a study tool. As it forms an independent narrative, it seems to stand best alone at the end of the Gospels with double brackets to show its inferior authority " Some English translations based on Westcott & Hort imitate this practice of appending the pericope at the end of the Gospel (e.g., The Twentieth Century New Testament), while others simply omit it altogether (e.g., Goodspeed, Ferrar Fenton, the 2013 revision of The New World Version). and Codex Athous Laurae ("") (8th or 9th century); in the first three it is preceded with a copyist's note about being found in only some manuscripts, in it follows verse 8 without such a note, and in all four the Shorter Ending is followed by the Longer Ending. Using Kolmogorov complexity to measure difficulty of problems? Conclusion: the FACT is that the King James Bible you buy off the shelf today is VIRTUALLY IDENTICAL to the King James Bible of 1611. And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? Which translation of the bible does this version of the Lord's Prayer come from? It is because the Word of God gets it power from the spoken word. 7 Oxford English Dictionary.s.v. Why is the Lord's Prayer different in the NIV and KJV? King James Onlyists frequently argue that the KJV is superior because it is based on the Textus Receptus tradition, and Douay-Rheims Onlyists often argue for the Douay's superiority from the fact . Metzger speaks of the "inconcinnities" [sic] between the first 8 verses of chapter 16 and the longer ending, and suggests, "all these features indicate that the section was added by someone who knew a form of Mark that ended abruptly with verse 8 and who wished to supply a more appropriate conclusion. It does not appear at all in , A,B,E,L,P,, and other mss, some Italic, Syriac, Coptic, Slavonic, the best mss of the Latin Vulgate, and other versions, and quotations of this paragraph in Chrysostom. why does the kjv have extra verses; why does the kjv have extra verses. The spurious passage came into the Textus Receptus when Erasmus translated it from the Latin Vulgate and inserted it in his first edition of the Greek New Testament (Basel, 1516). B.F. Westcott theorized that these verses "are probably fragments of apostolic tradition, though not parts of the evangelic text. "8 And again, he stooped down, and wrote on the ground. already by Shaks. [28] The majority of Greek manuscripts copied after 600 AD and the majority of translations made after 600 AD do not include the verse. In fact, there is a denominational distinction as well: the standard Catholic version of the Lord's Prayer does not include it, but most Protestants do put it in. In some copies, however, this also is added 'Now when He was risen early [on] the first day of the week, He appeared first to Mary Magdalene '." Each member of the task-force was arranged in six groups. But the words quoted above complicate this story by asserting that miraculous cures were already taking place at this pool in the absence of Jesus, owing to the unpredictable intervention of an (apparently invisible) angel. Mark. Does the inerrancy of the Bible only apply to the original manuscripts? Reason: This verse is very similar to Matthew 6:15. kjv - Why does the NIV have 16 verses missing from the Bible Post author By ; Post date sunkissedcoconut return policy; paula vasu obituary on why does the kjv have extra verses on why does the kjv have extra verses The KJV preserves lexicographical and syntactical Hebraisms (William Rosenau, Hebraisms in the Authorized Version of the Bible). rev2023.3.3.43278. Reasons: The earliest resources including p47, , A,C, several minuscules, several Italic mss, the Vulgate, the Armenian and Ethiopic versions, and quotation in some early Church Fathers support "he stood" (or "it stood"). Strangely, it is very easy to verify all of these points by simply visiting www.biblegateway.com and entering in the above verse numbers or cross referencing the words in the table below. Scrivener put it, "No doubt this verse is an unauthorised addition, self-condemned indeed by its numerous variations. (2 Samuel 12:22) And he said, While the child was yet alive, I fasted and wept: for I said, Who can tell whether GOD will be gracious to me, that the child may live? How can we prove that the supernatural or paranormal doesn't exist. ", I John 5:7: "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. (2 Samuel 12:23) But now he is dead, wherefore should I fast? An additional complication is that no such ", Textus Receptus editions differ among themselves for the inclusion of the. The reason is that the modern versions are made from more reliable manuscripts than the KJV, which was made from 10th century codex. The translators claim at least 40000 mistakes in the KJV. This is an exact figure. The real question is why does the KJV have 16 extra verses! And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from the evil one. [122] The attachment of neither the Longer nor Shorter Ending (nor both of them) smooth this "ragged edge to an imperfect document". In the least, they ought to be counted. Recovering from a blunder I made while emailing a professor, Is there a solution to add special characters from software and how to do it, Minimising the environmental effects of my dyson brain. why does the kjv have extra verses - brijnaari.com The sentiment was articulated (but not originated) by what Rev. If, on the other hand, there are 100,000 changes to the KJV, that averages out to one out of nearly eight words (1:7.91328 is the precise ratio), or 45.745 words.2 Thus, if my statistics are correct, we should expect to find one or more instances per verse, on average, and a grand total in the double digits. They begin near the bottom of the second column of a verse, and are continued on the recto of the next folio." Why do academics stay as adjuncts for years rather than move around? The above are just a few verses that illustrate how, by simply editing a few words the whole inference and power of the verse is diminished. It is present in A,,,13, and some Italic mss. The King James Bible of 1611 was printed in the GOTHIC TYPE FACE! The original Hebrew is the word re'em which was translated monokeros in the Septuagint and unicornis in the Latin Vulgate. why does the kjv have extra verses - ftp.billbeattiecharity.com [verse 8] For at those words, in almost all copies of the Gospel According to Mark, comes the end. ), Codex Regius ("L") (8th cent.) KJV: 6:11 And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear you, when ye depart thence, shake off the dust under your feet for a testimony against them. Amen. Books of the Catholic Bible vs. Protestant Bible - Bible Study Blueprint The King James Version is in the public domain. Yet other ancient sources include this longer ending but mark it with asterisks or other signs or notations indicating the copyists had doubts about its authenticity, most notably 1 and several minuscules (all twelfth century or later), according to the UBS notes and Bruce Metzger. The principal problem affecting this paragraph is that, although it appears in many ancient manuscripts, it does not consistently appear in this place in chapter 8 nor even in the Gospel of John. Reason: The verse closely resembles Mark 9:29, but it is lacking in Matthew in (original handwriting), B, , some Italic & Syriac & Coptic & Ethiopic manuscripts.It is, however, found in this place in some Greek mss not quite so ancient - C, D, K, L - as well as some other mss .